Violence Court Judge of Barcelona takes custody of a child from 2 years to mother and gives the father, a doctor with psychological problems, believing that attachment parenting is harmful to the child.
Judge FVT of Violence Court No. 2 in Barcelona, \u200b\u200bawarded custody of a child to a parent accused of abuse, psychological problems requiring treatment and medication, and a clear inability parental arguing that the mother is assiduous a forum for natural parenting, practice co-sleeping (sleeping with the child in the same room or bed) and considers it a permissive mother for his affinity to attachment parenting.
This type of parenting is beginning to respect the outcome of children, love and respect to their needs and emotions, providing a constant loving care, practice positive discipline and strive to achieve a balance in personal and family life.
However, despite this, considering this type of parenting as harmful to the child of two years, the judge has given final custody, after having given provisional no basis in December 2009, the father of minor, it having been reported for child abuse and being in a state of depression that requires treatment, as evidenced by the report of Sataf, a public body in charge of psychological skills.
This expert report, you can read that father is not able to describe your child, anticipating their needs and empathize with the child. Can provide economic stability to have a permanent job (it has a security guard working in the subway, with rotating shifts) but emotionally and intellectually only the mother is able to meet those needs. It is also reported that the child spends most of the nights that correspond to the father, his paternal grandparents in their house and not under the care of the custodial parent, this has sparked emotional instability and stress the child.
the same expertise is apparent that the mother has many tools to meet the emotional and intellectual, cognitive skills, social, emotional and intellectual are optimal and can offer great stability on an emotional level, but stress the fact that it is foreign and has no family here.
The father discredits the mother figure and prioritizes the figure of the paternal grandparents over the mother figure, who despite the whole situation, preserve the father figure at all times.
magistrate
This led it reports the status of children where hard facts were reported related to the serious neglect that was receiving the child by the father, with conclusive evidence, however, were rejected and refused to act ex officio initiating an investigation. In aggravation, the ruling makes fun of these reports and accused the mother of tendentious use them for the sole purpose of discrediting the father and complain of their way to care for the child. Attitude that has been shown to have no mother and confirmed by the psychologist Sataf.
The mother was set at the initial maintenance allowance of 150 euros, in the interim order, based on the earnings of (an aid of 420 euros per month) and now decides that it will rise to 200 euros because it shows that he has gotten some clients of his work as a graphic designer and can afford it. Even the judge argues that the parent may provide food and health when the mother is able to feed and clothe him smoothly and the English health system is free.
The statement argues that the mother does not have enough income to support the child, but it increases the pension, accept its extensive parenting skills and tools but is accused of permissive parenting follow some guidelines based on respect for their child and how , says he has no family here so try to imply that she is alone and left without a single family (his son) and a very clear situation of social exclusion.
The sentence will be appealed before the Provincial Court of Barcelona but it is important to spread these facts, the case we shows that there can be no economic over emotional well-being, much less when one party is unable to provide intellectual and emotional stability to a minor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment